A Great Way To Market Yourself If You Are Looking For Or Will Ever Look For A Job

A few days ago I received an email from a first year law student, Justin, and he posed a very interesting question.  His email read;

“What is your personal opinion of law students having their own resume-styled website? I tried to do some research and could not find many that existed. Having an undergrad degree in Graphic Design, I've built my own. What do you think?”

Well my personal opinion is that setting up your own personal webpage to market yourself is an excellent idea! This idea extends far beyond law students and is an excellent thing to do for anyone including students in other disciplines, lawyers, and also any other professionals. This is a great idea for anyone that is or will be looking for a job and/or anyone that could benefit from positive marketing.

Here is Justin’s Site: www.justinhwalters.com

Justin is exactly the type of innovative law student that our profession needs and the idea of creating your own website to showcase yourself is something that I wish I had thought of.  Also, it is always a good idea to use part of your prior life (in Justin’s case marketing and graphic design) to make some money or compliment a new legal or professional life. 

       A few comments about this exceptional marketing tool.

Why Is Setting Up A Personal Website A Good Idea?

I started to write this section myself but then remembered that Justin had already done an excellent job summarizing on his website why setting up your own website is a good idea.  As such, I will copy his words which echo my exact thoughts.

“I believe there is a need for students to have their own websites with their resumes, portfolios, and contact information.  I believe it is beneficial for professional students, especially those studying law, to be able to place a personal website address on their business card or in the signature of their email.  Having a website can be appealing to prospective employers because it shows you are independent, creative and ready to advance into a more professional role.”

I will only add one additional point and that is that the webpage puts all of the relevant information that an employer wants (short bio, resume, writing sample, skills) in one place and makes it all easily accessible.  Given that employers spend very little time assessing candidates you want to make your information as easy to access as possible and A simple webpage accomplishes this. 

What Does It Take To Get Set Up?

I am not a web designer but am confident that with a bit of determination I could create a page like the page that Justin has created. Wordpress is the web design tool of choice but if you do not want to use that there are many other options available with templates that will get you started.  In terms of hosting the website, that costs around $5 a month (a more complex website would be maybe $8 a month because it has more space) and you will pay around $10 a year for domain name. (You should try and nab your own name – just think of where Barack Obama would be if he had not purchased his domain name www.barackobama.com years ago).   

It literally takes a few hours to set everything up and install a simple website and if you prefer not to do it yourself you can always hire Justin.  Justin can design a website just like his own for you (and I must say it is a very professional looking website) and his fees are extremely reasonable.  You can contact Justin through his website - www.justinhwalters.com.  As for the upkeep, if someone can operate Facebook, they can operate a Wordpress blog as it is really user friendly.

The Lowdown

In this economy you cannot afford to be at a disadvantage and it is important to ensure that you are constantly improving, marketing and selling your brand.  This should start early in your career and creating a website is a great networking and marketing tool.   Creating your own personal website also forces you to give some thought to what important things you want to showcase to the world and may encourage you to constantly reevaluate key aspects to showcase.

Here is an excellent example that demonstrates that proper networking and marketing goes a long way. In this case, Justin sent me his website a few days ago and as a direct result of his marketing and networking efforts, I am likely going to hire him to work on my new law firm website - www.legalservicesincorporated.com. I currently use a template (yes, I know it looks like a template) but will hire Justin to create something that is closer to my own style. How is that for marketing efforts quickly finding a job!  I am also certain that some of you reading this blog will contact him to work on your websites.  This is only one example of how innovation and marketing yourself in the new cyber world can increase your chances of success and put money in your pocket.

I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on the website idea and again please feel free to contact Justin if you need help with your website. His contact information is all on his website.  Here it is again. www.justinhwalters.com

Judge Throws Out Law Students' Lawsuit Over Misleading Job Statistics and Says Students Should Have Know What They Were Paying $150,000 For

A few weeks ago I wrote an article titled Were Law Students Snookered By Law School Job Statistics (click here to access) and I concluded that while law schools should report accurate data, a student could not reasonably argue that they went to law school because of the one page of a law school’s website that said they would get a job right after graduation. 

Apparently a New York Supreme Court Judge agrees.  Last week, the Judge tossed out the first of many lawsuits brought by students who claimed they were snookered by misleading job statistics.  The significant part of the court decision is reposted here.

The court does not view these post-graduate employment statistics to be misleading in a material way for a reasonable consumer acting reasonably. By anyone's definition, reasonable consumers -- college graduates -- seriously considering law schools are a sophisticated subset of education consumers, capable of sifting through data and weighing alternatives before making a decision regarding their post-college options, such as applying for professional school. These reasonable consumers have available to them any number of sources of information to review when making their decisions.

The Judge’s argument is in essence that because potential law students are “sophisticated” and have many sources of information available at their fingertips they knew or should know that employment and salary statistics provided by the law school should not be the sole basis for their decision. 

Sound familiar?  It should as here is what I wrote and posted a few weeks before the decision.

That being said, I also think students have a responsibility to perform some research about the job market such that they are comfortable with a decision to become a lawyer.  A simple internet search will (and would have) shed some light on the fact that not every lawyer is making a six digit salary and that finding a job as a lawyer (especially in this economy) is difficult.  In addition, the law school application process is extensive and it strikes me that at some point during that six month to year process (LSAT, application, acceptance, summer) that a student has an affirmative responsibility to investigate the job prospects a bit more than relying on the webpage of a private law school. 

I for one am happy the lawsuit was thrown out and I hope that the cases in other States follow the same path. Law schools should report meaningful job statistics but suing a private institution because you were "misled" by a statistic on a webpage is not the answer in my opinion. Not everything should be a lawsuit and this entire situation is an example of the world looking in and seeing the legal profession (law schools, students, lawyers) behaving badly.  

To be clear, this is not the fault of students but I do not think that lawsuits are the answer here.  As such, I feel the case being thrown out for EXACTLY the reasons stated in the decision is exactly what should have happened.  I recognize that this opinion is not shared by everyone and would welcome feedback and commentary so that both sides are adequately represented.

Do Not Worry About Whether You Will Pass The Bar Exam Because There is Almost a 90% Chance That You Will Pass It On Your First Attempt

If you are a first time writer, there is a very good chance that you will pass the Bar exam on your first attempt so you should not stress yourself out.  The FACT is that almost 90% of first time writers in most States pass the bar on their first attempt so if you are not used to being in the bottom 10%, there is no reason for you to believe that you will be in the bottom 10% when you sit for the bar exam.  Unlike law school, the Bar exams set a minimum standard and the examiners have not set a special number of people they expect to pass. As such, if you meet that standard you will pass. The key to passing of course is studying and doing practice questions.  If you study, you most likely will not have anything to worry about and if you did not study, you can always take the exam again in the next sitting.

A complete list of statistics regarding pass rates for 2009 in all States can be found at http://www.ncbex.org/assets/media_files/Statistics/2009Stats110111.pdf and you can see from this table that approximately 88% of first time writers from ABA approved law schools (the 200 or so law schools in the U.S.) passed the bar exam on the first try.  In order to find this though, you must go to page 17 of this table and look at a chart called, “First-Time Exam Takers and Repeaters from ABA-Approved Law Schools.”

This table illustrates though that pass rates for Bar examinations are somewhat confusing so you should understand what you are reading.  First, the pass rates are broken down in a number of different ways.  The overall pass rate is not a very good indicator as it includes people who are second time takers and in some States the pass rate includes foreign trained lawyers.  Both of these latter categories score very poorly on the bar exam and bring the overall pass statistic down.  For example, for the 2009 bar examination in July, the overall pass rate for New York was 72%.  When you look at the detail though, you will see that for first time takers from law schools in the United States, the pass rate was 88%.  During that same period, those who repeated the exam in July only achieved a pass rate of 35%.  Similarly, those who sat for the Bar examination in New York from Law Schools outside of United States had a pass rate of 34%.  All of these combined make up the 72% pass rate.

As you can see, first time takers from law schools in the U.S. do very well on the bar exam.  In some States, the pass rate for first time takers is over 90% (and for some it is 100%) and these high pass rates are the norm.  As indicated, second time takers and foreign lawyers really bring down the State averages so it is best to look at statistics from the category to which you belong. 

That being said, do not let the high pass rates fool you. You must study for the bar!  I know of two people from Harvard Law School that failed the New York Bar examination on their first attempt.  When I spoke with these individuals they indicated that they had only done a small number of the practice essay and multiple-choice questions where I did hundreds.  The key to passing the Bar is preparation and generally this preparation should start with a Bar Preparation course.

Were Law Students Snookered by Law School Job Statistics?

By now you should have heard about the controversy surrounding how some law schools report statistics on job data.  If you have not, you should know that for some schools when you see a statistic that says 95% of students have a job after graduation, this may simply means that they are “employed” and the percentage often includes people who are working at McDonalds, at bars, collecting census information, cleaning houses and…well you get the picture.  A friend told me that when he started law school and was setting up his cable, the customer service operator told him that she was an alum from the school he was going to attend.  She too, the operator, was most likely included in that school’s job data stats. 

This reporting has led to a wave of protest and even lawsuits as students argue that they were misled and that if they would have known how dismal the job market was, they would not have spent $200,000 to go to law school.  Others use the statistics and the poor job market to dissuade some from applying to law school arguing that there is a glut of lawyers on the market.  One individual on another blog called for comprehensive reform and called for an advertising campaign "similar to a proactive public health education on HIV," before students "ruin their lives."  (I found this description a bit on the dramatic side but who am I to say) A few points on this topic.

First, I fully support accurate reporting of job statistics and students should make an informed decision as to whether or not they want to attend law school.  The legal profession is based on ethics and has many professional responsibility requirements that clearly law schools and lawyer should follow.  Law schools should not wait for regulation to force them to accurately report and all should take the steps that some law schools have already taken to accurately report.   The American Bar Association (ABA) has recently developed standards that should at least in part address some of the issues.

That being said, I also think students have a responsibility to perform some research about the job market such that they are comfortable with a decision to become a lawyer.  A simple internet search will (and would have) shed some light on the fact that not every lawyer is making a six digit salary and that finding a job as a lawyer (especially in this economy) is difficult.  In addition, the law school application process is extensive and it strikes me that at some point during that six month to year process (LSAT, application, acceptance, summer) that a student has an affirmative responsibility to investigate the job prospects a bit more than relying on the webpage of a private law school.  As such, I am not a big fan of suing your law school and would not consider it even if I did not find a job.  To be clear, these comments in no way absolve law schools from the responsibility to publish meaningful statistics but rather are meant to prompt current and prospective students to examine the true reasons they decided or will decide to become lawyers. 

I also feel that students should not give up on a dream to become a lawyer because of a current poor job market.  The fact is that given the poor economy many graduates in all fields have and will continue to have a tough time getting a job and this should not stop an individual from going after the profession they desire.  If you go to law school and want to become a lawyer, you should do it for the right reasons.  If this is the case, you will find a job (eventually) as long as you keep plugging away at it.  I have many friends that went to Brooklyn Law School who graduated in 2010 and it is true that when I sat for the bar that summer, many did not have jobs (legal or other).  I recently connected with many of them through Linkedin and see that now most do have jobs in a legal field.  

You should also keep in mind that a law degree is often not a printing press when it comes to making money.  Many lawyers are not making hundreds of thousands of dollars but neither are many MBAs, Accountants or other professionals.  If money is the only reason you want to become a lawyer you should seek another profession. (perhaps a banker but even many of them are unemployed now).  In addition, I believe that a law degree will help you in many other fields.  I also have an M.B.A and to tell you the truth I have found my J.D. much more helpful.

I suppose that one good thing about the controversy is that it may create a large group of lawyers who go to law school for the right reasons.  Presumably those who are unsure or think that they will not make enough money will decide to do something else that will satisfy this need.  

Should You “Paralegal” Before Law School?

          Many prospective law students wonder whether or not there are advantages associated with taking a job as a paralegal prior to law school.  In fact, this question came up last week when I sat on a panel with two other lawyers and a law student at Harvard University where a college student was thinking about spending a year after college working as a paralegal.  The panel members had mixed responses and here is a flavor of the discussion.  First, this post only addresses the specific question of whether or not you should work as a paralegal in order to increase your chances of getting into law school.  A job as a paralegal is a very respectable job and this post does not address whether or not you should select that as a career. 

Will a Job as a Paralegal Make Your Law School Application More Competitive?

          There was general consensus that a job as a paralegal is not going to make your law school application any more competitive.  In fact some felt that you may be at a slight disadvantage as many associate the role of a paralegal with administrative tasks.  If you really want to make your law school application more competitive, you might be better served to take a year prior to law school pursuing something that you are interested in so that you can passionately describe an interesting chapter of your life to the admissions committee.  If being a paralegal fits this description then that is fine too but describing your year as a paralegal will at best show a general interest in law and it is not certain that you will be able to talk about your experience in a way that will impress most lawyers or admission committee members.

Will you get Great Experience that Will Help Your Application?

          One college student at the panel discussion also wondered whether a paralegal job would provide him with valuable “legal” experience.  Generally, the consensus was that it would not.  This is especially the case if you are a paralegal in a large firm where the administrative tasks will far outweigh any substantive experience.  Some panel members did note though that they had jobs in the not-for-profit sector where paralegals gained valuable experience and performed tasks similar to tasks that lawyers perform.   I have also seen this in smaller companies where the paralegal was able to perform substantive tasks.

Will Being A Paralegal Help You Get A Job as A Lawyer?

          Generally the consensus was that taking a job as a paralegal prior to law school would not help you find a legal related job.  The results here could differ if you perform substantive tasks.  In addition one important thing to note is that many are under the mistaken impression that if you work as a paralegal in a large firm that they will hire you after law school.  While this is possible, I know many people who worked as paralegals at large firms and were not picked up by that firm during the recruitment process.  Even if you are hired, it will definitely be because you had great grades and were an attractive candidate.  I personally do not feel that being a paralegal adds much to make you an attractive candidate but opinions may differ here.  Also, I do know people who worked as paralegals for large firms and are now employed there. Again though, these students had excellent grades and were probably offered positions at other top firms.  That is, I doubt they got the job because they were a paralegal at the firm.  Also again, I know many more people who were not ever offered a job at the firm where they worked as a paralegal.  

What are Some of the Advantages?

          The key advantage associated with being a paralegal is that you get an up front look at what being a lawyer is like.  (mind you it will not show you what law school is like & for me a great part of being a lawyer was the law school experience)  A preview of the life of a lawyer can be particularly helpful if you are a “big law” paralegal because it may give you insight as to whether you want to commit to the big law life. (long hours, unpredictability, etc.)   I am not sure that this is a good enough reason to work as a paralegal though as you could get a good insight by speaking to people or perhaps doing an internship during law school.  Moreover, as a paralegal you may be exposed to one narrow area of law that may turn you off law altogether.  Lawyers often end up in numerous fields and this one glimpse may not be enough to make an informed decision regarding a career. 

Advice

          There are two pieces of advice here.  First, if you take time off after college (75% of Harvard Law School’s last entering class took a year off), focus on something that you have a passion for and something that you want to do.  This will make you happy and will also make for excellent material for your application.  With many good students applying to top schools, the schools are often looking at that time off to determine what the student is made of.  I am not sure that being a paralegal does a great deal to put you ahead of the person that say went to a third world country to feed the starving or build schools.   Second, if you do want to work as a paralegal prior to going to law school, sit down and talk to some lawyers who worked as paralegals prior to going to law school.  You should also speak to several current paralegals to see what they like and dislike about their jobs. 

          To conclude, I will repeat that being a paralegal is a very respectable job but if the question is will it help you get into law school or get a legal job, my answer is no.

This summary is one of many that are offered in the new book, Law School Lowdown (Barron's Publishing).  You can order the new book written by Harvard Law School graduate, Ian E. Scott, by clicking here.  

http://www.amazon.com/Law-School-Lowdown-Secrets-Application/dp/143800317X

How To Publish While in Law School Voted Top Post!

           If you have not already, check out my latest publication in the Lawyerist!  The article summarizes the benefits of publishing while in law school and gives you some practical tips on how to make an effective submission.  See why last week it was the Top Post!  
          View the entire article: www.How To Publish While In Law School.com
          Please feel free to like, tweet and/or share the page.

Do Not Borrow Time From Subsequent Exam Questions As You May Not Be Able To Repay The Loan

Another key to law school success is time management on exams.  This is yet another area where person after person will offer the same advice but in the heat of an exam, many reject it.  Here is the key piece of advice yet again.  At the beginning of an exam, take note of how much each question is worth and divide your time accordingly.  Once you have done this, DO NOT BORROW TIME FROM OTHER QUESTIONS.   While it is hard to do, you should get into the habit of noting the time and once you have reached the time on a question, you should stop (even in mid sentence – ok, you can finish your sentence) and move on to the next question. 

There are a few good reasons for this strategy.  First, you have likely picked up the majority of the points you will gain on the question you are laboring over and the time you will spend will likely not yield many more points.  Second, if you do not move on from a question you are stuck on, you may not finish the exam and a blank exam question means a low grade.  Third, the subsequent questions on the exam may be easy. When I sat for the NY bar, the last question on the exam was a very simple corporations question.  If I had borrowed time from the first few more difficult questions though, I would have missed easy points on that last question.   At the end of the day, a point is a point and I will gladly take an easy one that takes me one minute rather than 10 minutes.  Finally, you can always go back to a question if you have time.  This is a far better strategy and the break from the question may even give you alternate ways to approach the question. 

This bit of advice was one of the first that my first law school professor, Linda Feldman, gave the class for our first law school exam.  Regrettably many did not listen to her.  The exam was made up of two questions and each of them was equally weighted.  Go figure the first question was tough and I could have spent the full exam period trying to nail down the question.  Instead though, I stopped writing after half of the time and moved on to the second question.  The second question was almost identical to a question that the class had gone over during a review of an old exam and it was easy to pick up easy points. I ended up with an A on the exam but many of my fellow classmates left the exam barely touching the second question. 

For February bar exam takers, keep this key piece of advice in mind. It will serve you well.

Why You Should Publish In Law School & Tips For Successful Law Journal Submissions

Check out my new publication in the Lawyerist See article that describes what editors are looking for & what makes and effective submission!  For the full article, click here.  Please feel free to "like", "tweet", and/or "share"!

Sitting for the Bar in July? How Many Bar Exams Should You Sit For?

As you may know, as a general rule, you are required to sit for a bar exam in every State you wish to practice in.  While in law school, the question often comes up of how many exams you should sit for on your first attempt.  In my opinion, you should try to take Bar Examinations from 2 States right after you graduate from Law School. There are a few good reasons for this. 

First, the best time to take a Bar Examination is immediately after you finish law school as you will have retained a significant amount of core knowledge and this knowledge will dissipate over time.  This knowledge makes it easier to pass the bar exam and you are best positioned to do this right after law school.

Second, when you study for one State’s Bar Examination, you may not have to do much additional work to pass another State’s exam.  A few things to keep in mind here. First, most bar exams consist of two days – one day will be made up of a local State day and one will be the Multi-State Bar Exam (MBE), and the MBE is the same exam for every State.   Your score on each day is added together and each State will determine whether you have passed or failed.  If you sit for two bar exams (one in your primary State and one in another State) most if not all States will allow the MBE score to be transferred to the State if it is taken concurrently with your primary State.  Most States however will not permit you to take the MBE one year for one State and then have it count towards the Bar Examination in a different year or session.  For example, New York used to permit candidates to count their MBE score from a prior year towards a current session and as such, in the past the candidate would only have had to sit for the local New York portion of the exam. (1 day as the person would not have to sit for the MBE).  Starting in 2011 though, New York only allows candidates to transfer MBE scores from another State if the exam in the other State was taken in the concurrent session.  Many other States have similar rules.  To clarify, if you sit for two bar exams, you would sit for the exam for three days instead of two.  This extra day can help you avoid sitting for the grueling 200 multiple choice MBE in another year.

Another good reason to sit for two bar exams is that many State exams do not contain much State specific information.  For example, the New Jersey bar exam tests only 7 subject areas and six of those areas are covered on the MBE.  (and the other will likely be covered by your primary State)  As such, the only additional work you will have to do for that exam is sit for the exam.  I sat for the NJ bar when I sat for the NY bar and I did not do ANY additional studying.  (ohhh..and I passed).  Other States are similar and even States where you do have to learn State specific material, it will almost certainly be in areas such as Corporations, Wills and Criminal Law.  As such, you will already have a foundation related to these courses from the work you will do to prepare for the primary State.

Another reason to sit for two bar examinations is that you are more marketable.  Even if you have a job, your situation may change and you may be looking for one in the future.  Being certified in many States not only shows initiative but could give you a practical advantage if a job requires certification in that State.

Lots of good reasons to consider sitting for two bar exams in July.

Study Groups - Should You Search for a "Smart" Person?

After my last post about what to avoid when looking for people to join your study group, a few people wrote to me and asked which positive qualities they should look for.  In particular, people asked about whether or not they should be looking for “smart” people so that they can perhaps take in some of that raw intelligence.  A few comments. 

               Regarding the selection of someone “smart”, remember that the people who are the most vocal in class are not necessarily the people who do the best on exams.  More often than not, you will find that the person that receives the highest grade in your class is a person that has not said a word all semester.  As such, do not discount someone because they do not speak in class as they may be exactly who you are looking for.  My study group and I were silent throughout all of first year (except when called on) and we all did very well on our exams.

               Another thing to consider regarding finding “smart people” is that some people that did very well in their undergraduate studies may not grasp law school very well.  As such, it is tough to really know who is “smart” from who is not and you will really have to go with your gut.  I am not sure that the search for smart is that worthwhile but perhaps something to consider.

Regarding personality traits, finding the right mix of traits is tough and this is especially the case in your first year when you do not really know people well (or at all).  You obviously want to avoid the obnoxious people who will monopolize the entire session with their inane ideas.  To get a good handle on this, perhaps just have an informal study session to kind of “test drive” the person.  Also, you should look for people that are conscientious and will come to the sessions prepared and ready to contribute.  Finally, you also want people that you get along with to make the pain of intense studying a bit more pleasant.  This last characteristic is extremely important as you will have to be able to coexist with this group for a long period of time.  I remember many long nights in my first year and it was nice to spend them with people that I genuinely liked.  As I mentioned in my last post, my first year study group and I still all regularly stay in touch and I am sure we will be life long friends who shared a very positive bonding experience.   Good luck with your search.

The Three C’s of Law School Success: go to Class, go to Class, go to Class

The most important advice I can give you about doing well in your first year of law school is to go to each and every class.  Several people who were not doing well after the first term asked me for advice on how they could improve their grades and invariably they were people who did not feel that going to class was that important.  I cannot tell you how many times I heard, “He just repeats what is in the textbook” or “I go to most classes”.  Going to half of the classes will get you half the grade and if you do not mind a B- or C, then do not bother going to class. 

This advice is applicable for all years in law school but especially the first year.  Even in my third year of law school, I would read and brief a case and be surprised when I would attend class and find that I missed a significant point.  In addition, often when I read cases and then subsequently went to a class, I found that I may not have paid as much attention to the part of the opinion that the professor found most interesting.  If a professor finds a particular aspect of an opinion fascinating, you can bet that this aspect is what is going to show up on the exam. 

For example, in some cases the professor may find the dissent (when there is a panel of Judges who vote and the Judge who loses writes about why he disagrees with the majority opinion) the most interesting part of the case and you may have just skimmed this to focus on what the winners said. This is just one example but rest assured that almost all professors gear exams towards what was covered in class which is what they found most important.

In addition, when you do not go to class or when you know that you will not go to class, you do not prepare.  The briefs that you prepare to deal with the Socratic method of teaching go a long way towards increasing your exam scores.  If you know that you are not going to go to class, you may not prepare a brief at all.  Even if you do prepare something knowing that you will not go to class, it will not be as thorough as if you thought that you might be called on to answer questions.  While the Socratic method might be a bit of a pain, the good thing about it is that it keeps you up to date so that studying for the final exam is easier and with this advance preparation your studying will be more effective.

Finally, there is one more important reason to attend class.  In law school, in order to study for law school exams, almost all students make what is called an outline.  An outline integrates the key points from your class notes, your briefs and the professor’s syllabus.  It is an invaluable tool and if you do not have class notes, making an outline becomes difficult or impossible.