Charleston Area Alliance: Blogging In Business

Thursday, 5 April 2007
Yesterday I participated in a panel discussion on the value of blogging in business. The Charleston Area Alliance held the event as a part of its CEO Roundtable Luncheon series.

Also serving on the panel was Matt Ballard, CEO of the Charleston Area Alliance who blogs at the CAA Blog and Skip Lineberg, Chief Creative Officer of Maple Creative who blogs at Marketing Genius from Maple Creative.

The event was a success and hopefully we were able to share some new information about the value of blogging and how it can impact the relationship you have with your clients and potential clients. It was a diverse group who attended and there were some great questions from the crowd.

Skip Lineberg has a post-presentation post on the event (with photos).

We intentionally decided not to hand out the presentation but rather make it available via our blogs through SlideShare (for those of you attending -- another one of the new web 2.0 companies). Call it the Flickr or YouTube for Power Point. Until today I had not used SlideShare which I first learned about from another West Virginia blogger, Lee Kraus who authors Learning and Technology. Lee has some interesting comments about the business uses of SlideShare.

Here are the slides from our presentation, The Value of Blogging In Business:

100 Great Reasons To Read Blawg Review #100

Sunday, 18 March 2007
Don't miss the special 100 anniversary edition of Blawg Review hosted by it's anonymous editor. This week's edition features posts from the past 100 hosts of Blawg Review. Blawg Review is a featured "blog carnival" this week at BlogCarnival.com.

A quick thanks to the Editor for allowing me the opportunity to host Blawg Review #44 and Blawg Review #97.

WV Passes (Almost) E-Prescribing Bill

Thursday, 15 March 2007
The West Virginia Legislature passed (almost) SB 69 (HB 2289) allowing West Virginia to join the majority of states that allow e-prescribing. It appears that technical errors that occurred as a result of the House and Senate mistakenly passing separate versions of the bill will be cleaned up in a special session on the state budget.

For more information check out the State Journal article, E-Prescribing Soon to Be Reality in W.Va. or iHealthBeat article, West Virginia Likely to Pass E-Prescribing Bill.

Charleston Area Alliance: The Value of Blogging In Business

Tuesday, 13 March 2007
The Charleston Area Alliance will be holding its CEO Roundtable Luncheon on April 4 where the topic for discussion will be "The Value of Blogging In Business."

I will be participating on a panel of Charleston area business bloggers along with Matt Ballard, CEO of the Charleston Area Alliance who blogs at the CAA Blog and Skip Lineburg, Chief Creative Officer of Maple Creative who blogs at Marketing Genius from Maple Creative.

I'm looking forward to sharing my ideas on business blogging and providing some practical tips to help local CEOs, professionals and other small business owners leverage the use of blogs in today's business market.

For more information about the event and how to register go to this link. The event is limited to 30 participants so don't wait to register.

The Ying and Yang of Health Privacy

Christina's Considerations posts a quote by Dr. William Yasnoff from a recent New York Times article, Warnings Over Privacy of U.S. Health Network. The quote caught my eye because it highlights what I'll refer to as the ying and yang involved in the conversion to a more comprehensive interoperable health information system and how you and I as patients may react.

The quote reads:
"Anything you do to make information more accessible for good, laudable purposes will simultaneously make it more accessible for evil nefarious purposes. People intuitively understand that, and they are worried."
Those of us working on health privacy and e-health issues should regularly consider and reassess this principal as we move forward to transform the way health information is collected, stored, used, disclosed and aggregated. Over the years to come health lawyers will play an increasingly important role in the process of addressing legal issues that arise from the concept highlighted by the quote.

One Space or Two?

For years I've thought I was right on this one -- but finally -- proof. Should you use one space or two spaces after a sentence? Adams Drafting has the answer in this post, "One Space or Two?".

I can't tell you how many legal secretaries I've tried to convince to stop hitting the space bar twice. I use full margin justification for my legal contracts and documents and adding two spaces after a sentence can leave too much white space between sentences. I remember taking typing in high school and being taught the two space bar rule after each sentence -- but that was on a manual typewriter.

For this and other great posts on contract drafting be sure to check out Adams Drafting, a great lawyer niche blog on contract drafting. I've been a regular RSS reader for a number of months.

Thanks to Alaina Crislip for pointing me to this post.

The False Claims Act: Recent Changes Affecting Health Care Entities

Tuesday, 6 March 2007
Amy Rothman, an attorney in the health care practice group at our firm recently authored an article on the False Claims Act and recent changes brought on by the Deficit Deduction Act of 2005 and West Virginia's fraud and abuse statute that will appear in the Spring 2007 edition of the Defense Trial Counsel of West Virginia Newsletter. Congratulations to Amy on a great article.

The article is titled, The False Claims Act: Recent Changes Affecting Health Care Entities

The False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., was enacted in 1863 during the presidency of Abraham Lincoln. The FCA, also known as the Lincoln Law, was established to prevent pricing fraud by persons and companies selling supplies to the Union Army during the Civil War. The original FCA contained a qui tam provision that allowed citizens, on behalf of the United States, to sue companies or individuals for false or fraudulent billings submitted to the government. The current version of the FCA still allows for qui tam actions for false or fraudulent claims. While the FCA applies to any false claim submitted to the United States government, the FCA has been actively used as a tool for combating Medicare and Medicaid billing fraud. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) reports that Medicare and Medicaid spending was over $500 billion for the 2006 fiscal year. In CMS’ 2006 Management’s Discussion and Analysis, administrators at CMS recognized that the best way to cut Medicare and Medicaid spending and maintain the integrity of the programs was to reduce Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services reports that it collected almost $2.3 billion in 2006 from false claims suits. By implementing and actively enforcing anti-fraud compliance laws, the government can recover more money and, thus, curb the amount of Medicare and Medicaid spending.

In order to further combat health care fraud and abuse, Congress enacted the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”), P.L. 109-171. The DRA contains provisions to slow mandatory spending in Medicare and Medicaid. Furthermore, the DRA includes a provision, § 6032, that requires health care entities to address fraud and false claims within the Medicaid system. Section 6032, entitled “Employee Education About False Claims Recovery,” requires entities receiving or making payments of more than $5 million annually in Medicaid reimbursement to establish policies and disseminate information to employees about the False Claims Act and anti-fraud compliance. Notably, the DRA does not contain a similar provision requiring entities to address fraud within the Medicare system.

On December 13, 2006, CMS issued a letter to provide guidance to state Medicaid programs and health care entities on compliance with § 6032. According to CMS, § 6032 applies to any health care entity making or receiving $5 million in Medicare payments, regardless of whether the entity is for-profit or not-for-profit, whether the payments are made at a single location or multiple locations, or whether the payments are made under multiple tax identification numbers. Entities subject to § 6032 must establish policies for all employees, including management, contractors, and agents, regarding false claims and fraud and abuse. Those policies must include detailed information about the federal FCA and any applicable state FCA, as well as the entity’s policies for detecting fraud, waste, and abuse. The entity must also provide information to employees regarding the right of an employee to be protected as a whistleblower in a qui tam action.

According to § 6032, the entity must include this information in its employee handbook. CMS indicates that an entity that does not have an employee handbook is under no obligation to create one. However, CMS does indicate that it is the entity’s responsibility to disseminate the written policies.

All health care entities subject to § 6032 were required to comply with the provisions of § 6032 by January 1, 2007. The penalty for non-compliance is high—health care providers can be excluded from participation in the Medicaid program. In addition, failure to establish and distribute false claims policies could result in false claims exposure. Furthermore, if a false claim action is brought against an entity and the entity is found liable, the entity may have to pay treble damages to the government.

Currently, West Virginia does not have a false claims act governing all governmental transactions. However, West Virginia does have a statute that regulates fraud and abuse in the Medicaid program, West Virginia Code § 9-7-1 et seq. Section 9-7-1 indicates that the purpose of West Virginia’s fraud and abuse statute is to combat the substantial sums of money that have been lost by the state and federal government in operation of the state’s Medicaid program.

West Virginia’s fraud and abuse statute states that “[a] person shall not make or present or cause to be made or presented to the [Department of Health and Human Resources] a claim under the medical programs of the department of welfare knowing the claim to be false, fraudulent or fictitious.” W. Va. Code § 9-7-5(b) (1981). The statute provides for both civil and criminal penalties. In addition, any person or entity that violates the statute is liable to the Department of Health and Human Resources for fines equal to three times the amount of any payments received from which that person or entity was not entitled. W. Va. Code § 9-7-6 (1981).

If history is any indication, West Virginia also may enact false claims provisions that mimic the federal law. The DRA provides an incentive to states that establish false claims statutes. Under the incentive, states with false claims statutes will receive an additional 10% of any funds recovered under that statute. Because of this incentive, it is likely that West Virginia will update its fraud and abuse statute.

In the future, it is likely that all entities, whether receiving more or less than $5 million in Medicaid payments, will be required to comply with § 6032’s false claims and anti-fraud policies. Additionally, if § 6032 helps curtail Medicaid spending, fraud, and abuse, it is plausible that Congress will enact similar policies for the Medicare program. Due to the DRA’s employee education requirements and state incentive to create false claims acts, the future holds a strong likelihood of increased false claims investigation and litigation.

Amy L. Rothman is a health care litigation attorney at Flaherty, Sensabaugh & Bonasso, PLLC. For questions, she can be reached at (304) 345-0200.

UPDATE: On March 20, 2007, CMS issued DRA 6032 - Employer Education About False Claims Recovery - Frequently Asked Questions an additional guidance document on interpretation of the new regulations. Additional guidance materials can be found under the State Medicaid Directors Letters section of the CMS website under Final Guidance Regarding Employee Education for False Claims Recovery.